Gretel Kutan
Luxury Hospitality Projects
EMEA · Globally Flexible

Practice · Advisory · Beach Clubs and Resort F&B

A beach club or a resort restaurant is the only part of a luxury property that has to succeed twice.

Once as something the resident guest uses, and once as somewhere people who are not staying choose to go. The two audiences want different things from the same footprint, at different hours, at different price points and often on different days.

Almost everything that decides whether a property can hold both is settled before anyone is running anything. What the place is. Who it is for, and who it is not for. What the brand promises, and how the audience it was built for ever hears about it. What the asset is expected to contribute, and to which part of the business. And who runs it.

That is the territory this practice works in: beach clubs, resort and lifestyle F&B, and the decisions that sit between the asset and its audience. It is not hotel operations and it is not design, which is part of why these questions keep falling between the people who do those two things.

An Independent Review looks at a property from the outside, answers a defined question and leaves. This is the opposite arrangement. One territory, in depth, working alongside the team that has to deliver the result. Most properties should start with a Review. A contained piece of outside work is the cheaper way to find out whether the question is the one you think it is.

Where the questions arrive

I.
Something is being created. A beach club, a resort restaurant, a conversion of an existing beachfront. What is decided at this stage is the concept, the brand, the positioning and the audience, and most of it cannot be revisited once the architecture is fixed. Concept and Positioning →
II.
Something exists and is not a destination. The place works. It fills when the hotel fills. What is in question is rarely the service. It is the concept, the positioning, the audience or the commercial role the asset was given, and those are four different problems that look identical from the inside. Repositioning →
III.
A decision about who runs it. Self-operate, build a brand that belongs to the asset, or bring in an external operator. If external, which one, and on what basis. The decision is consequential and difficult to reverse, while much of the readily available guidance comes from operators presenting their own models. Operator Selection Strategy →

What gets decided

Concept is what the place is, before it is what it looks like. Positioning is the claim it makes against everything else available that evening, to someone who has a choice. Audience is who it is for, which is only a real decision once it also says who it is not for. Brand is what holds those together across a season and a change of management.

Marketing is where most of this is won or lost with the second audience, and it is treated here as part of the proposition rather than as a layer applied afterwards. It covers brand and audience strategy, launch and relaunch, partnerships, programming where it works as a brand and audience instrument rather than as a calendar, local-market relevance, and how channels and commercial priorities line up behind a position. It cannot fix a concept that was only ever built for the resident guest, and saying so early is usually cheaper than a campaign.

Commercial role is the question underneath all of it. A beach operation may be expected to produce standalone profit, to support room rate and occupancy, to lift F&B spend across the property, to create destination relevance, to strengthen the brand, or some combination. A property that has never decided which cannot tell whether the asset is failing or performing exactly as intended.

The basis

The work rests on close to fifteen years in luxury hospitality, most of it inside an international operating company, across brand, marketing, commercial development, expansion and the opening of lifestyle assets. It is operator-side experience rather than hotel operations: decisions about what a place should be and who it is for, made where they had to work in an operating reality and against a commercial expectation. About Gretel →

How an engagement is shaped

Engagements are defined by a question rather than by a scope of hours, and they run for the period in which senior involvement is genuinely useful. In practice that means working alongside an owner, a development team or a general manager and their marketing and commercial leads, and producing the decisions, the definitions and the direction that the team then carries.

The work is direction rather than execution. It does not include media buying, campaign production, channel management, CRM implementation or running a marketing function, although assessing and directing those is frequently part of it. Terms are agreed privately and depend on the mandate.

A short conversation about the asset and the decision in front of it is usually enough to establish whether this is the right kind of involvement, or whether a Review would answer the question more cheaply. [email protected]

← Back to Practice